It is then their task to carefully assess the pedagogical value of the materials, to avoid simply giving in to angry demands that could undermine educational objectives and invite additional challenges in the future.
In the s and s, World War II and the rise of communism produced new limits on speech, and McCarthyism destroyed the lives of scores of law-abiding suspected communists. The United States claimed that Schenck threatened national security, and the justices agreed.
As individuals in the 20th century have challenged the government in the courts when they believed their rights were assaulted, the First Amendment has taken on a stronger meaning.
Members have participated in protests against timber cutting and both major national political conventions, among other things. In the s, the emphasis shifted to prohibiting sexual and violent lyrics. The government cannot sue the speech on the basis of its tendency or possibility illegal conduct incitement.
Sometimes, because of these reasons, they may argue that the materials are of no interest or value to the community. Quite the contrary. This information can be considered immoral or politically inconvenient by religious groups, the government, ethnic communities and media outlets.